ANTI-MORTGAGE AGENCY CRIMINAL FILE: Banks Can't Own Property
CASE LAW
National banking corporations are agencies or instruments of the general government, designed to aid in the administration of a important branch of the public service, and are an appropriate constitutional means to that end. Pollard v State, Ala 1880, 65 Ala 628
See, also, Tarrant v. Bessemer Nat Bank 1913, 61 So 47,7 Ala App 285
A national bank cannot lend its credit or become the guarantor of the obligation of another unless it owns or has an interest in the obligation guaranteed especially where it receives no benefits therefrom. Citizens’ Nat Bank of Cameron v Good Roads Gravel Co. Tex Civ App. 1921 236 SW 153 dismissed w.o.j
A national bank has no power to guarantee the performance of a contract made for the sole benefit of another. First National Bank v Crespi & Co.Tex Civ App 1920 217 SW 705
National banks have no power to negotiate loans for others. Pollock v Lumberman’s Nat Bank of Portland Or 1917 168 P 616 86 Or 324
Project: Paper Planes
Project Paper Planes is a program we have created with the purpose of creating solutions to the "paper problem". Many false and fraudulent documents along with legally binding contracts have passed through trillions of hands throughout history. These papers have been the cause of many problems facing individuals and families on a financial and 'legal' level. The main problem is MOST PEOPLE DON'T READ WHAT THEY RECEIVE, REQUEST OR SIGN! This fact has caused generation after generation to sign up for 'involuntary servitude' and to be governed and regulated.
If you think there is nothing you can do about it ..... YOU ARE WRONG! Here's why:
Inc.
The Power of Paper
In the reality we live in, we would be wise to accept that we live in a world that has laws, and these laws exist on paper and fortunately some laws exist in our hearts and conscience. Since the dawn of laws-of-man there existed a piece of paper that was held above all others; an Affidavit. A sworn statement of truth that if ‘un-rebutted’ stands as the agreement of the parties, the judgement in commerce and the truth in commerce. So please humour me and answer the following (I have placed my answers in brackets):
-
Are you a man or woman? (Yes)
-
Are you an artificial entity of the UNITED STATES aka CITIZEN, VESSEL, PERSON, SUBJECT, TAXPAYER, LEGAL FICTION, RESIDENT or INDIVIDUAL? (No)
-
Do you belong to the UNITED STATES? (No)
-
Should you be coerced into presenting yourself as a ‘public’ entity? (No)
-
Are you capable of swearing an oath? (Yes)
-
Are you liable to or for any political/corporate rules (statutes)? (No)
-
As a man/woman do you have to voluntarily elect to submit to give another party jurisdiction over you? (Yes)
-
Should your use of bank notes or any other public facility when alternatives are generally unavailable tie you into a contract of some sort? (No)
-
Should you be coerced into receiving vaccinations or any other medical treatments and procedures? (No)
-
Are your words your definitions and not for redefining? (Yes)
If you answered the above with the same answer as given then that is your truth, yes? So imagine this as your sworn Affidavit being presented because as a man you are receiving injury from another party, i.e. Corporations:
-
The Affiant is a private, living and sentient man.
-
The Affiant is not a UNITED STATES “citizen,” “subject,” “vessel” or “person” or any ens legis artificial entity, procedural phantom, legal fiction or juristic personality within the UNITED STATES.
-
Affiant is foreign to and without the UNITED STATES.
-
Any party that would order, represent or persuade the Affiant to falsely present the Affiant as a UNITED STATES citizen, vessel or person directly or by deception, device, misnomer, mistaken identity, warrant or indictment, real or imagined, would be engaging in Enticement to Slavery.
-
Any party that alleges a liability against the Affiant is obligated to produce an Affidavit of Liability to demonstrate such liability.
-
The Affiant is not liable to or for any Government statutes, rules and/or codes, including, without limitation, UNITED STATES Codes and statutes and/or codes of any of Respondents’ political subdivisions.
-
A legal fiction corporation cannot secure in personam jurisdiction over or against Affiant, a living man, without Affiant’s voluntary election to submit.
-
The Affiant’s use of a notary public, Promissory Notes, and/or any other public facilities, when alternatives are generally unavailable, does not comprise Affiant’s submission to any political jurisdiction, the creation of an adhesion contract expressly or tacitly with the UNITED STATES and/or any other party real or imagined, or an appearance before any body or tribunal, administrative or judicial, real or imagined.
-
It would be both a violation of law and a violation of the Affiant’s God given unalienable rights if any government/corporative agent, officer or employee attempts to, or does in-fact, force, coerce, manipulate and/or deceive the Affiant into receiving any form of medical treatment at anytime whatsoever, including but not limited to vaccinations.
-
All words herein are as Affiant defines them.
-
So, as an operation of law, the Respondent, if they want to rebut, has to rebut your Affidavit point-by-point via a sworn affidavit and providing ‘evidence to support’ why your statement is not true. Are they ever going to be able to do that? Of course they are not; and they never can, because your affidavit offers facts and truth and all the legal world can ever offer is fraud and falsehoods. So what have you got then? You have got a lawfully binding agreement of the highest order that no other party can impair.
Our organization teaches these concepts and laws as well as how to read legal documents and how to correct the MANY mistakes made in regards to an individual's rights and freedoms. We also hold online and offline workshops to help people get out of this big paper mess..... SINCE THIS IS A PAPER WAR..... WE'RE SENDIN' IN THE PLANES!
PAPER PLANES - Our Documents
Are You A Voter? Or An Elector?
September 5, 2014
Electoral Status Change Letter
There Has OBVIOUSLY Been A Mistake
November 15, 2014
Writ Of Error
Do You UNDERSTAND?
April 22, 2013
Notice Of Understanding
United States - US- U.S.-USA-America
Means: (A) a federal corporation . . . Title 28 USC Section 3002(5) Chapter 176. It is clear that the United States . . . is a corporation . . . 534 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT 724.
`It is well settled that "United States" et al is a corporation, originally incorporated February 21, 1871 under the name "District of Columbia," 16 Stat. 419 Chapter 62. It was reorganized June 11, 1878; a bankrupt organization per House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933, Senate Report 93-549, and Executive Orders 6072, 6102, and 6246; a de facto (define de facto) government, originally the ten square mile tract ceded by Maryland and Virginia and comprising Washington D. C., plus the possessions, territories, forts, and arsenals.
The significance of this is that, as a corporation, the United States has no more authority to implement its laws against "We The People" than does Mac Donald Corporations, except for one thing -- the contracts we've signed as surety for our collective entity with the United States and the Creditor Bankers. These contracts binding us together with the United States and the bankers are actually not with us, but with our artificial/dead/collective entity, or as they term it "person", which appears to be us but spelled with ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
